Seeking a fresh perspective: a research funder's view of open access
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.114Abstract
For open access (OA) to become a reality, all stakeholders will need to engage positively with each other to rise to the substantial practical challenges it brings. This means moving beyond advocacy and resistance towards a more mature, evidence-based dialogue that seeks to understand all perspectives and find workable solutions. For research funders, scholarly publication delivers crucial public benefits; funders' OA mandates should be seen as tools for maximizing these benefits. The Higher Education Funding Council for England's (HEFCE) policy for open access in the next Research Excellence Framework (REF) has been put together by listening to all sides of the debate, and its success depends on continuing positive, sensitive and engaged discussions between everyone involved.
References
Joint Information Systems Committee (Jisc), Modelling Scholarly Communication Options: Costs and benefits for universities. Report on behalf of Jisc by Swan, A, 2010, London, Key Perspectives.\nFinch Dame J , Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications. Report of the Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings, 2012.\nBudapest Open Access Initiative: <a href="http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read" target="_blank" >http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nResearch Information Network (RIN), Heading for the open road: costs and benefits of transitions in scholarly communications. Report on behalf of RIN, Research Libraries UK, the Wellcome Trust, the Publishing Research Consortium and Jisc, 2011.\nHigher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE): <a href="http://www.hefce.ac.uk/news/newsarchive/2012/statementonimplementingopenaccess/" target="_blank" >http://www.hefce.ac.uk/news/newsarchive/2012/statementonimplementingopenaccess/</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nUnited Nations, Universal Declaration on Human Rights, Article 27. United Nations, 1948.\nJisc, Economic Implications of Alternative Scholarly Publishing Models: Exploring the costs and benefits. Report on behalf of Jisc by Houghton, J, Rasmussen, B, Sheehan, P, Oppenheim, C, Morris, A, Creaser, C, Greenwood, H, Summers M and Gourlay, A, 2009, Centre for Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University and Information Science, LISU and Economics, Loughborough University.\nPoynder R, 1 July 2013, Open Access: Where are we, what still needs to be done?, Open and Shut: <a href="http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/open-access-where-are-we-what-still.html" target="_blank" >http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/open-access-where-are-we-what-still.html</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nTen years on from the Budapest Open Access Initiative: <a href="http://www.webcitation.org/6AdLcI1TC" target="_blank" >http://www.webcitation.org/6AdLcI1TC</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nHEFCE: <a href="http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2013/201316/#d.en.82765" target="_blank" >http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2013/201316/#d.en.82765</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nHEFCE: <a href="http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/rsrch/howfundr/" target="_blank" >http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/rsrch/howfundr/</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nHEFCE: <a href="http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/news/news/2013/open_access_letter.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/news/news/2013/open_access_letter.pdf</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nHEFCE: <a href="http://www.hefce.ac.uk/news/newsarchive/2012/statementonimplementingopenaccess/" target="_blank" >http://www.hefce.ac.uk/news/newsarchive/2012/statementonimplementingopenaccess/</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nBoynton R S, The Tyranny of Copyright?, The New York Times: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/25/magazine/the-tyranny-of-copyright.html" target="_blank" >http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/25/magazine/the-tyranny-of-copyright.html</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nBailey J, CCo Waiving Copyrights, Plagiarism Today: <a href="http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/25/cc0-waiving-copyrights/" target="_blank" >http://www.plagiarismtoday.com/2009/02/25/cc0-waiving-copyrights/</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nPrice D, Gold or green: which is the best shade of open access?, Times Higher Education: <a href="http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/420454.article" target="_blank" >http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/420454.article</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nBritish Academy: <a href="http://www.britac.ac.uk/openaccess/" target="_blank" >http://www.britac.ac.uk/openaccess/</a> (accessed 6 February 2014)\nHEFCE: <a href="http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/rsrch/rinfrastruct/oa/" target="_blank" >http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/rsrch/rinfrastruct/oa/</a> (accessed 6 February 2014)\nMonbiot G, Academic publishers make Murdoch look like a socialist, The Guardian: <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/aug/29/academic-publishers-murdoch-socialist" target="_blank" >http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/aug/29/academic-publishers-murdoch-socialist</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nAnderson K, 22 October 2013, UPDATED: 73 Things Publishers Do (2013 Edition), The Scholarly Kitchen: <a href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2013/10/22/updated-73-things-publishers-do-2013-edition/" target="_blank" >http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2013/10/22/updated-73-things-publishers-do-2013-edition/</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nMatsuuchi A Ovadia S Rojas A Stern C, Open Access: Profiteering Publishers, Prezi: <a href="http://prezi.com/ibcpet0wkqcd/open-access-profiteering-publishers/" target="_blank" >http://prezi.com/ibcpet0wkqcd/open-access-profiteering-publishers/</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nWallace M, The Murky Climate of the “Editorial peer Review” Debate, The Bubble Chamber: <a href="http://thebubblechamber.org/2011/01/the-murky-climate-of-the-%E2%80%9Ceditorial-peer-review%E2%80%9D-debate/" target="_blank" >http://thebubblechamber.org/2011/01/the-murky-climate-of-the-%E2%80%9Ceditorial-peer-review%E2%80%9D-debate/</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nBonham K, 21 February 2012, The Future of Science Publishing, ScienceBlogs: <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/webeasties/2012/02/21/the-future-of-science-pub/" target="_blank" >http://scienceblogs.com/webeasties/2012/02/21/the-future-of-science-pub/</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nHouse of Commons Business, Innovation and Skills Committee, Open Access, Fifth Report of Session 2013–14. House of Commons, 2013.\nAssociation of Research Libraries: <a href="http://policynotes.arl.org/post/62715845222/canceling-green-oa-journals-a-very-expensive-way-to" target="_blank" >http://policynotes.arl.org/post/62715845222/canceling-green-oa-journals-a-very-expensive-way-to</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nDavis P, 18 September 2012, Open Access Embargoes – How Long is Long Enough?, The Scholarly Kitchen: <a href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/09/18/open-access-embargoes-how-long-is-long-enough/" target="_blank" >http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/09/18/open-access-embargoes-how-long-is-long-enough/</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nPoynder R, 25 June 2013, Springer tightens rules on self-archiving, Open and Shut: <a href="http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/open-access-springer-tightens-rules-on.html" target="_blank" >http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/open-access-springer-tightens-rules-on.html</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nInstitute of Historical Research: <a href="http://www.history.ac.uk/news/2012-12-10/statement-position-relation-open-access" target="_blank" >http://www.history.ac.uk/news/2012-12-10/statement-position-relation-open-access</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nRoyal Historical Society: <a href="http://www.royalhistoricalsociety.org/RHSPresidentOA%20E-letterJune2013.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.royalhistoricalsociety.org/RHSPresidentOA%20E-letterJune2013.pdf</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nFinch Dame J , ref. 2, section 3.48.\nHouse of Lords Science and Technology Committee, The implementation of open access, Third Report. House of Lords, 2013.\nSHERPA/RoMEO: <a href="http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/PaidOA.php" target="_blank" >http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/PaidOA.php</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nBjörk B, The Hybrid Model for Open Access Publication of Scholarly Articles: a Failed Experiment?, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012.\nUK Open Access Implementation Group (OAIG), Going for Gold? The costs and benefits of Gold Open Access for UK research institutions: further economic modelling. Report on behalf of the OAIG by Swan, A and Houghton, J, 2012, Key Perspectives and Victoria University.\nHEFCE: <a href="http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/whatwedo/research/infrastructure/openaccess/summary_advice_open_access.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/whatwedo/research/infrastructure/openaccess/summary_advice_open_access.pdf</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nPoynder R, ref. 8, 23 May 2013, The UK's Open Access Policy: Controversy Continues <a href="http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/the-uks-open-access-policy-controversy.html" target="_blank" >http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/the-uks-open-access-policy-controversy.html</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nKingsley D, Public research, private profits, Cosmos, 2012.\nResearch Libraries UK: <a href="http://www.rluk.ac.uk/files/RLUK%20BIS%20Open%20Access.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.rluk.ac.uk/files/RLUK%20BIS%20Open%20Access.pdf</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nSubscription Pricing for Hybrid Journals, Wiley Online Library: <a href="http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-816521.html" target="_blank" >http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-816521.html</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nAnderson K, 29 January 2013, In Praise of “Double-Dipping” – Fairness, Affordability, Vitality, and Sustainability, The Scholarly Kitchen: <a href="http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2013/01/29/in-praise-of-double-dipping-fairness-affordability-vitality-and-sustainability/" target="_blank" >http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2013/01/29/in-praise-of-double-dipping-fairness-affordability-vitality-and-sustainability/</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nRoyal Society of Chemistry: <a href="http://www.rsc.org/Publishing/librarians/GoldforGold.asp" target="_blank" >http://www.rsc.org/Publishing/librarians/GoldforGold.asp</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nBhaksar M, The Content Machine: Towards a Theory of Publishing from the Printing Press to the Digital Network, 2013, Anthem Press.\nKrichel T Warner S, Disintermediation of Academic Publishing through the Internet: An Intermediate Report from the Front Line. In Hübler A Linde P Smith J, ELPUB, 2001, IOS Press.\nHEFCE: <a href="http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/rsrch/rinfrastruct/oa/" target="_blank" >http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/rsrch/rinfrastruct/oa/</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nHEFCE: <a href="http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/rsrch/rinfrastruct/oa/" target="_blank" >http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/rsrch/rinfrastruct/oa/</a> (accessed 6 February 2014)\nLaakso M, Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: a study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed, Scientometrics, 2014.\nHEFCE: <a href="http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/rsrch/rinfrastruct/oa/" target="_blank" >http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/rsrch/rinfrastruct/oa/</a> (accessed 6 February 2014)\nThomson J, The Death of the Scholarly Monograph in the Humanities? Citation Patterns in Literary Scholarship, Libri, 2002.\nOpen Science: <a href="http://openscience.com/the-forever-decline-academias-monograph-crisis/" target="_blank" >http://openscience.com/the-forever-decline-academias-monograph-crisis/</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nSteele C, Scholarly Monograph Publishing in the 21st Century: The Future More Than Ever Should Be an Open Book, Journal of Electronic Publishing, 2008, 11(2).\nResearch Assessment Exercise 2008: <a href="http://www.rae.ac.uk/pubs/2008/01/" target="_blank" >http://www.rae.ac.uk/pubs/2008/01/</a> (accessed 4 February 2014)\nBritish Academy: <a href="http://www.britac.ac.uk/openaccess/" target="_blank" >http://www.britac.ac.uk/openaccess/</a> (accessed 6 February 2014)\nHEFCE: <a href="http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/rsrch/rinfrastruct/oa/monographs/" target="_blank" >http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/rsrch/rinfrastruct/oa/monographs/</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nHEFCE: <a href="http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/rsrch/rinfrastruct/oa/ideas/" target="_blank" >http://www.hefce.ac.uk/whatwedo/rsrch/rinfrastruct/oa/ideas/</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nJisc, The Value and Benefits of Text Mining to UK Further and Higher Education. Report on behalf of Jisc by Viewforth Consulting and The University of Strathclyde, 2012, Jisc.\nHargreaves I , Digital Opportunity: A Review of Intellectual Property and Growth. Report on behalf of the Intellectual Property Office (IPO) by Ian Hargreaves, 2011, IPO\n16 July 2012, Carrigan M, A researcher's survival guide to information overload and curation tools, LSE Impact of Social Sciences: <a href="http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2012/07/16/researchers-guide-info-overload-curation/" target="_blank" >http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2012/07/16/researchers-guide-info-overload-curation/</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nWorld Wide Web Size: <a href="http://www.worldwidewebsize.com/" target="_blank" >http://www.worldwidewebsize.com/</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nBasulto D, 20 September 2013, The future of books: from Gutenberg to e-readers, Washington Post: <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/innovations/wp/2013/09/20/the-future-of-books-from-gutenberg-to-e-readers/" target="_blank" >http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/innovations/wp/2013/09/20/the-future-of-books-from-gutenberg-to-e-readers/</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nThe Design Observer Group: <a href="http://places.designobserver.com/feature/print-and-pixel-the-digital-future-of-publishing/38124/" target="_blank" >http://places.designobserver.com/feature/print-and-pixel-the-digital-future-of-publishing/38124/</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nFranzen J, 5 Famous Writers Who Loathe E-Books, Time: <a href="http://techland.time.com/2012/01/31/5-famous-writers-who-loathe-e-books/" target="_blank" >http://techland.time.com/2012/01/31/5-famous-writers-who-loathe-e-books/</a> (accessed 23 January 2014)\nSwanson C, Gauging the Print, E-book Divide, Publishers Weekly, 2013.\n
Published
2014-03-03
Issue
Section
Articles
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2014 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms. If a submission is rejected or withdrawn prior to publication, all rights return to the author(s):
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Please note if accepted for publication your work will be open access and distributed under a CC-BY Licence, unless previously agreed with Insights Editors before submission.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Submitting to the journal implicitly confirms that all named authors and rights holders have agreed to the above terms of publication. It is the submitting author's responsibility to ensure all authors and relevant institutional bodies have given their agreement at the point of submission.
Note: some institutions require authors to seek written approval in relation to the terms of publication. Should this be required, authors can request a separate licence agreement document from the editorial team (e.g. authors who are Crown employees).