Worldwide open access: UK leadership?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.26.1.14Abstract
The web is destined to become humankind's cognitive commons, where digital knowledge is jointly created and freely shared. The UK has been a leader in the global movement toward open access (OA) to research but recently its leadership has been derailed by the joint influence of the publishing industry lobby from without and well-intentioned but premature and unhelpful over-reaching from within the OA movement itself. The result has been the extremely counterproductive ‘Finch Report’ followed by a new draft of the Research Councils UK (RCUK) OA mandate, downgrading the role of cost-free OA self-archiving of research publications (‘green OA’) in favor of paying subscription publishers over and above subscriptions, out of scarce research funds, in exchange for making single articles OA (‘hybrid gold OA’). The motivation of the new policy is to reform publication and to gain certain re-use rights (CC-BY), but the likely effect would be researcher resistance, very little OA and a waste of research funds. There is still time to fix the RCUK mandate and restore the UK's leadership by taking a few very specific steps to clarify and strengthen the green component by adding a mechanism for monitoring and verifying compliance, with consequences for non-compliance, along lines also being adopted in the EC and the US.
References
Poynder R, 28 October 2012 [blog comment, The OA Interviews: Ian Gibson, former Chairman of the UK House of Commons Science & Technology Committee], Poynder blog: <a href="http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/the-oa-interviews-ian-gibson-former.html" target="_blank" >http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/the-oa-interviews-ian-gibson-former.html</a> (accessed 15 January 2013)\nAdams J, Global Research Report United Kingdom, Evidence, 2011, Thomson Reuters: <a href="http://sciencewatch.com/sites/sw/files/sw-article/media/globalresearchreport-uk.pdf" target="_blank" >http://sciencewatch.com/sites/sw/files/sw-article/media/globalresearchreport-uk.pdf</a>\nFinch Dame Janet , Accessibility, sustainability, excellence: how to expand access to research publications. Report of the Working Group on Expanding Access to Published Research Findings, 2012: <a href="http://www.researchinfonet.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Finch-Group-report-FINAL-VERSION.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.researchinfonet.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Finch-Group-report-FINAL-VERSION.pdf</a>\nResearch Councils UK (RCUK) policy document: <a href="http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/documents/RCUK%20_Policy_on_Access_to_Research_Outputs.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/documents/RCUK%20_Policy_on_Access_to_Research_Outputs.pdf</a>\nRegistry of Open Access Repositories (ROAR): <a href="http://roar.eprints.org/" target="_blank" >http://roar.eprints.org/</a>\nRegistry of Open Access Repositories Mandatory Archiving Policies (ROARMAP): <a href="http://roarmap.eprints.org/" target="_blank" >http://roarmap.eprints.org/</a>\nGargouri Y Hajjem C Lariviere V Gingras Y Brody T Carr L Harnad S, Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research. PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (10), e13636: <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0013636" target="_blank" >http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0013636</a> (accessed 13 February 2013)\nHitchcock S, The effect of open access and downloads (‘hits’) on citation impact: a bibliography of studies, The Open Citation Project – Reference Linking and Citation Analysis for Open Archives, 2012: <a href="http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html" target="_blank" >http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html</a> (accessed 15 January 2013)\nGargouri Y Lariviere V Gingras Y Carr L Harnad S, Green and Gold Open Access Percentages and Growth, by Discipline. Montreal: 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI), 2012: <a href="http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/340294/" target="_blank" >http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/340294/</a> (accessed 15 January 2013)\nXia J F Gilchrist S B Smith N X P Kingery J A Radecki J R Wilhelm M L Harrison K C Ashby M L Mahn A J, A Review of Open Access Self-Archiving Mandate Policies, Libraries and the Academy, 2012, 12(1), 85–102: <a href="http://www.eisenhower.press.jhu.edu/journals/portal_libraries_and_the_academy/portal_pre_print/archive/articles/12.1xia.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.eisenhower.press.jhu.edu/journals/portal_libraries_and_the_academy/portal_pre_print/archive/articles/12.1xia.pdf</a>\nROARMAP, ref. 6.\nLaakso M Björk B-C, Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure, BMC Medicine, 2011, 10:124: <a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/10/124" target="_blank" >http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/10/124</a> (accessed 15 January 2013)\nLaakso M Welling P Bukvova H Nyman L Björk B-C Hedlund T, The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009, PLOS ONE, 2011, 6(6), e20961: <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0020961" target="_blank" >http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0020961</a> (accessed 15 January 2013)\nUniversity of Southampton (School of Electronics and Computer Science), University of Southampton Open Access Self-Archiving Mandate 2003: <a href="http://roarmap.eprints.org/1/" target="_blank" >http://roarmap.eprints.org/1/</a> (accessed 13 February 2013)\nWellcome Trust Open Access Mandate 23 July 2006: <a href="http://roarmap.eprints.org/22/" target="_blank" >http://roarmap.eprints.org/22/</a> (accessed 21 January 2013)\nPoynder R, ref. 1.\nROARMAP, ref. 6.\nEPrints: <a href="http://www.eprints.org/" target="_blank" >http://www.eprints.org/</a>\nTansley R Harnad S, Eprints.org Software for Creating Institutional and Individual Open Archives, D-Lib Magazine, 200, 6 (10): <a href="http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october00/10inbrief.html#HARNAD" target="_blank" >http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october00/10inbrief.html#HARNAD</a> (accessed 15 January 2013)\nHarnad S Carr L Brody T Oppenheim C, Mandated Online RAE CVs Linked to University Eprint Archives: Enhancing UK Research Impact and Assessment, 2003, Ariadne 35: <a href="http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue35/harnad" target="_blank" >http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue35/harnad</a> (accessed 15 January 2013)\nUniversity of Southampton, ref. 14.\nHarnad S, Appendix 127, Written Evidence, UK Parliamentary Select Committee on Science and Technology, 2004: <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmsctech/399/399we151.htm" target="_blank" >http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmsctech/399/399we151.htm</a> (accessed 15 January 2013)\nCarr L DeRoure D Harnad S Hey J Hey A J G Hitchcock S Oppenheim C, Recommendations for UK Open-Access Provision Policy, 2004: <a href="http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/harnad/Temp/UKSTC.htm" target="_blank" >http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/harnad/Temp/UKSTC.htm</a> (accessed 15 January 2013)\nJISC, Open Access, 2012: <a href="http://www.jisc.ac.uk/openaccess" target="_blank" >http://www.jisc.ac.uk/openaccess</a> (accessed 15 January 2013)\nGargouri Y , ref. 9.\nGargouri Y Lariviere V Gingras Y Brody T Carr L Harnad S, Testing the Finch Hypothesis on Green OA Mandate Ineffectiveness, Open Access Week 2012: <a href="http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/344687/" target="_blank" >http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/344687/</a> (accessed 15 January 2013)\nSHERPA/ROMEO, Publisher copyright policies and self-archiving (statistics for the 1187 publishers in the RoMEO database), 2012: <a href="http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/statistics.php?la=en&fIDnum=|&mode=simple" target="_blank" >http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/statistics.php?la=en&fIDnum=|&mode=simple</a> (accessed 15 January 2013)\nRCUK, ref. 4.\nPublisher and Institutional Repository Usage Statistics 2 (PIRUS2), 2011: <a href="http://www.cranfieldlibrary.cranfield.ac.uk/pirus2/tiki-download_wiki_attachment.php?attId=170&page=PIRUS2" target="_blank" >http://www.cranfieldlibrary.cranfield.ac.uk/pirus2/tiki-download_wiki_attachment.php?attId=170&page=PIRUS2</a>\nRCUK, ref. 4.\nRCUK, ref. 4.\nHarnad S, United Kingdom's Open Access Policy Urgently Needs a Tweak, D-Lib Magazine 18 (9/10): <a href="http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september12/harnad/09harnad.html" target="_blank" >http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september12/harnad/09harnad.html</a> (accessed 15 January 2013)\nGargouri Y , ref. 26.\nVan Noorden R, Britain aims for broad open access, Nature News, 19 January 2012: <a href="http://www.nature.com/news/britain-aims-for-broad-open-access-1.10846" target="_blank" >http://www.nature.com/news/britain-aims-for-broad-open-access-1.10846</a> (accessed 15 January 2013)\nLiege ID/OA mandate: <a href="http://roarmap.eprints.org/56/" target="_blank" >http://roarmap.eprints.org/56/</a>\nRCUK, ref. 4.\nSale A Couture M Rodrigues E Carr L Harnad S, Open Access Mandates and the ‘Fair Dealing’ Button. In: Dynamic Fair Dealing: Creating Canadian Culture Online, Ed. Coombe R J Wershler D, 1012: <a href="http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/268511/" target="_blank" >http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/268511/</a> (accessed 15 January 2013)\nFor those who are worried about OA embargoes, there is a way to tide over user needs during embargoes too, with the repository's automated email-eprint-request Button. And be assured that the fastest, surest and cheapest way to hasten the inevitable and well-deserved death of OA embargoes – and a universal conversion to pure gold OA, along with as much libre OA as researchers want and need – is for institutions and funders to first mandate green gratis OA worldwide.\nHarnad S, ref. 32.\nKaiser J, NIH Steps Up Enforcement of Public Access Policy. AAAS ScienceInsider, 16 November 2012: <a href="http://bit.ly/VepuHV" target="_blank" >http://bit.ly/VepuHV</a> (accessed 15 January 2013)\nHarvard University Faculty of Arts and Sciences Open Access Policy, 2008: <a href="http://roarmap.eprints.org/75/" target="_blank" >http://roarmap.eprints.org/75/</a>\nShieber S, The Harvard open access initiatives, Las Jornadas Os-Repositorios: La proyección de los repositorios institucionales, 10 al 12 de Diciembre 2008, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid: <a href="http://eprints.ucm.es/8496/" target="_blank" >http://eprints.ucm.es/8496/</a> (accessed 15 January 2013)\nPoynder R, 3 December 2012 [blog comment, The OA Interviews: Stuart Shieber and the Harvard Open Access Policy], Poynder blog: <a href="http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/the-oa-interviews-harvards-stuart.html" target="_blank" >http://poynder.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/the-oa-interviews-harvards-stuart.html</a> (accessed 21 January 2013)\nHarnad S, Is It True That It's Illegal To Mandate Green OA Self-Archiving in Germany?, Open Access Archivangelism, 16 November 2012: <a href="http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/959-.html" target="_blank" >http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/959-.html</a> (accessed 15 January 2013)\nIntegrating Institutional and Funder Open Access Mandates: Belgian Model, 23 December 2011: <a href="http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/864-.html" target="_blank" >http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/864-.html</a> (accessed 15 January 2013)\nHoughton J W Rasmussen B Sheehan P J Oppenheim C Morris A Creaser C Greenwood H Summers M Gourlay A, (2009) Economic Implications of Alternative Scholarly Publishing Models: Exploring the Costs and Benefits, Report to JISC by Victoria University and Loughborough University, 2009: <a href="http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/rpteconomicoapublishing.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/rpteconomicoapublishing.pdf</a>\nSwan A Houghton J W, Going for Gold? The costs and benefits of Gold Open Access for UK research institutions: Further economic modelling, Report to the UK Open Access Implementation Group (July 2012): <a href="http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/610/" target="_blank" >http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/610/</a> (accessed 15 January 2013)\nHoughton J Swan A, Planting the green seeds for a golden harvest: Comments and clarifications on ‘Going for Gold?’, D-Lib Magazine 2013,19(1–2): <a href="http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january13/houghton/01houghton.html" target="_blank" >http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january13/houghton/01houghton.html</a> (accessed 21 January 2013)\n
Published
2013-03-01
Issue
Section
Articles
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2013 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms. If a submission is rejected or withdrawn prior to publication, all rights return to the author(s):
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Please note if accepted for publication your work will be open access and distributed under a CC-BY Licence, unless previously agreed with Insights Editors before submission.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Submitting to the journal implicitly confirms that all named authors and rights holders have agreed to the above terms of publication. It is the submitting author's responsibility to ensure all authors and relevant institutional bodies have given their agreement at the point of submission.
Note: some institutions require authors to seek written approval in relation to the terms of publication. Should this be required, authors can request a separate licence agreement document from the editorial team (e.g. authors who are Crown employees).