Abstract
Altmetrics were born from a desire to see and measure research impact differently. Complementing traditional citation analysis, altmetrics are intended to reflect more broad views of research impact by taking into account the use of digital scholarly communication tools. Aggregating online attention paid to individual scholarly articles and data sets is the approach taken by Altmetric LLP, an altmetrics tool provider. Potential uses for article-level metrics collected by Altmetric include: 1) the assessment of an article's impact within a particular community, 2) the assessment of the overall impact of a body of scholarly work, and 3) the characterization of entire author and reader communities that engage with particular articles online. Although attention metrics are still being refined, qualitative altmetrics data are beginning to illustrate the rich new world of scholarly communication, and are emerging as ways to highlight the immediate societal impacts of research.
References
Altmetric: <a href="http://altmetric.com/" target="_blank" >http://altmetric.com/</a>\nImpactStory: <a href="http://impactstory.org/" target="_blank" >http://impactstory.org/</a>\nPlum Analytics: <a href="http://www.plumanalytics.com/" target="_blank" >http://www.plumanalytics.com/</a>\nLiu J Adie E, Five challenges in altmetrics: a toolmaker's perspective, Bulletin of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2013, April/May: <a href="http://asis.org/Bulletin/Apr-13/AprMay13_Liu_Adie.html" target="_blank" >http://asis.org/Bulletin/Apr-13/AprMay13_Liu_Adie.html</a> (accessed 23 Apr 2013)\nPLOS Article-Level Metrics: <a href="http://article-level-metrics.plos.org" target="_blank" >http://article-level-metrics.plos.org</a> (accessed 23 Apr 2013)\nAdie E Roe W, Altmetric: enriching scholarly content with article-level discussion and metrics, Learned Publishing, 2012, 26 (1), 11–17. DOI: <a ext-link-type="doi" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20130103" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20130103</a>\nAltmetric Explorer: <a href="http://www.altmetric.com" target="_blank" >http://www.altmetric.com</a> (accessed 30 Apr 2013)\nFarnan J M , Online medical professionalism: patient and public relationships: policy statement from the American College of Physicians and the Federation of State Medical Boards, Annals of Internal Medicine, 2013, 158 (8), 620–627. DOI: <a ext-link-type="doi" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00100" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-8-201304160-00100</a> (accessed 11 June 2013)\nLiu J, 17 April 2013, Interactions: The Doctor is Online, Altmetric blog: <a href="http://altmetric.com/blog/interactions-the-doctor-is-online" target="_blank" >http://altmetric.com/blog/interactions-the-doctor-is-online</a> (accessed 23 Apr 2013)\nLiu J, ref. 9.\nEysenbach G, Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2011, 13(4), e123. DOI: <a ext-link-type="doi" href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2012" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2012</a> (accessed 11 June 2013)\nThelwall M , Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other candidates, PLOS ONE, 2013, in press.\nGibson D Baier A Chamberlain S, 17 January 2013, Uptake of Journal of Ecology papers in 2012: A comparison of metrics (UPDATED), Journal of Ecology blog: <a href="http://jecologyblog.wordpress.com/2013/01/17/uptake-of-journal-of-ecology-papers-in-2012-a-comparison-of-metrics" target="_blank" >http://jecologyblog.wordpress.com/2013/01/17/uptake-of-journal-of-ecology-papers-in-2012-a-comparison-of-metrics</a> (accessed 23 Apr 2013)\nGibson D Baier A Chamberlain S, ref. 13.\nLiu J, 29 October 2012, Interactions: It's OK, Scientific Stupidity is Normal, Altmetric blog: <a href="http://altmetric.com/blog/interactions-its-ok-scientific-stupidity-is-normal" target="_blank" >http://altmetric.com/blog/interactions-its-ok-scientific-stupidity-is-normal</a> (accessed 23 Apr 2013)\nSchwartz M A, The importance of stupidity in scientific research, Journal of Cell Biology, 2008, 121, 1771.\nAltmetric article details: The importance of stupidity in scientific research: <a href="http://altmetric.com/details.php?citation_id=174125" target="_blank" >http://altmetric.com/details.php?citation_id=174125</a> (accessed 23 Apr 2013)\n
License
Copyright (c) 2013 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms. If a submission is rejected or withdrawn prior to publication, all rights return to the author(s):
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Please note if accepted for publication your work will be open access and distributed under a CC-BY Licence, unless previously agreed with Insights Editors before submission.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Submitting to the journal implicitly confirms that all named authors and rights holders have agreed to the above terms of publication. It is the submitting author's responsibility to ensure all authors and relevant institutional bodies have given their agreement at the point of submission.
Note: some institutions require authors to seek written approval in relation to the terms of publication. Should this be required, authors can request a separate licence agreement document from the editorial team (e.g. authors who are Crown employees).
